As it looks to establish itself as a significant political force, Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) reaffirmed its ambitions during a recent national convention in Erfurt, Thuringia. Co-leader Alice Weidel, who retained her leadership post, pointed to favorable polling that positions the party as a leading contender in Germany's political arena. "We are the strongest force. We are a people's party with 30% support. And we will govern," Weidel declared, echoing her party's intent for leadership amidst a shifting political landscape.
During the convention, Weidel secured her position with 81.3% of the delegate votes, marking a slight increase from her prior standing. Her co-chair, Tino Chrupalla, however, faced a decline in support, attaining only 70%. The re-election of Weidel, who previously led the AfD in the 2025 federal elections, signals a consolidation of power as many of her allies filled key positions in the new federal board.
Shift Towards Hardline Leadership
The newly-elected board composition indicates a possible escalation of the AfD's extreme viewpoints. With six of its fourteen members linked to state branches classified by Germany's domestic intelligence as right-wing extremist organizations, the party is likely to continue its aggressive approach to distill its political identity apart from mainstream parties.
A notable addition to the leadership is Jean-Pascal Hohm, head of the party’s youth wing, "Generation Deutschland." Hohm previously resigned from his role within the AfD parliamentary group due to ties with extremist groups, underscoring the party’s growing embrace of radical elements. Furthermore, Stefan Möller, an associate of prominent AfD figure Björn Höcke, will oversee interactions with German security authorities, marking an ongoing challenge to the establishment.
Ongoing Scrutiny from Intelligence Agencies
The AfD's growing power is matched by scrutiny from Germany's domestic intelligence, which has classified it as a right-wing extremist party across multiple states. The critics highlight inflammatory statements from party members targeting democracy and calls into question the equality of citizenship, particularly related to migrants and marginalized groups. This calls into focus the party's controversial narratives regarding national identity and inclusion.
Möller has been known for questioning inclusivity, making public statements that suggest a narrow definition of German identity, further complicating the AfD's standing with security agencies.
Despite previous conventions marred by internal disputes, this gathering revealed a different dynamic. With three pivotal state elections approaching in 2026, the AfD leadership focused on presenting a unified front to capitalize on its growing support rather than engaging in factional battles.
Policy Ambiguity from Leadership
However, the convention also exposed a lack of substantive policy discussion. Weidel focused on critiquing the government’s past two decades of policy without outlining specific proposals beyond general nationalist rhetoric. The absences of calls for substantive changes, such as a return to nuclear energy or halting aid to Ukraine, were particularly notable. Instead, Weidel’s comments served primarily to rally support through nationalistic sentiments, calling for a connection to Germany’s flag colors — "Let us drape the entire country in black, red, and gold."
Peaceful Protests Against AfD
Amidst this political landscape, the convention was met with large, peaceful demonstrations against the AfD. Tens of thousands voiced their opposition in Erfurt, reflecting a wide-ranging coalition of civil society, unions, and religious leaders concerned about the party's agenda. One speaker, Jens-Christian Wagner, director of the Buchenwald Memorial, delivered a stern message to the gathering, suggesting that the party should "remigrate yourselves into the history books," critiquing their use of the dehumanizing term "remigration."
This response highlights the ongoing civil challenge faced by the AfD as it asserts its political ambitions in a country that remains deeply divided on issues of immigration and national identity. As the party strengthens its internal structure and prepares for more elections, the political implications will continue to unfold.
In summation, the AfD's recent steps reaffirm its vigorous pursuit of power, but the duality of its aspirations coupled with public resistance sets the stage for a contentious political climate in Germany.
