The Effectiveness of Online Career Training: A Mixed Bag for Students

| 2 Min Read
Online career training for high schoolers is expanding rapidly, but its effectiveness varies significantly among students and programs.

Cori Space's journey through Alabama Destinations Career Academy highlights the disparities in online career training programs. After struggling to keep up in a traditional school setting due to personal health issues, her family turned to this virtual school, run by Stride Inc., which promises a head start on careers through its advertised career tracks. However, the reality was far from this promise. Despite enrolling in a curriculum designed to prepare students for various occupations, Cori found her experience lacking—her classes were limited to just two hours twice a week, and there was little engagement regarding her career path.

Her mother, Hilary Space, expressed confusion regarding the program's designation as a career readiness initiative, noting the short school days left little room for practical learning. In contrast, other students, like Mileka Hager from Idaho, flourished in a similar program. At the Idaho Technical Career Academy, Mileka not only engaged in core classes but also participated in business-related courses, leading to her earning eight professional certifications that significantly boost her job prospects.

The surge of interest in career and technical education (CTE) reflects a broader trend where students are increasingly seeking pathways that could offer financial stability without the burden of steep college tuition. Stride and comparable for-profit educational institutions have responded by enhancing their career-oriented programs in recent years. However, the effectiveness of these online solutions varies, raising questions about quality and outcomes.

One of the pivotal challenges of online career training is accommodating the diverse needs of students, many of whom pursue this route due to anxiety or barriers that hinder traditional education settings. Moreover, practical experience, often essential for specific career paths, remains difficult to facilitate in a virtual format. This can lead to a disconnect between advertised benefits and actual student readiness upon completion.

Regulatory oversight of online CTE programs is inconsistent, with some states like Idaho enforcing stringent standards, while others, like Alabama, allow for a more decentralized approach. In Idaho, Stride's online programs are governed by independent boards and oversight committees that assess the quality of career tracks. In comparison, Alabama's model has come under scrutiny for inadequate monitoring, allowing varying degrees of effectiveness across programs.

Alisha Hyslop from the Association for Career and Technical Education emphasizes the importance of hands-on experience within vocational education. For successful programs, opportunities such as job shadowing, work-based learning, and certification paths are essential. At the Wisconsin Destination Career Academy, for instance, students engage in live online classes while also participating in optional career activities like job shadowing.

However, the voluntary nature of these experiences raises concerns about student engagement. Factors that draw students to online environments—like anxiety—may also hinder their willingness to pursue additional opportunities. Recent data revealed that only 16 students from the Wisconsin academy earned industry-recognized certifications over several years, with the school's academic performance ranking it in the bottom tier statewide.

Stride representatives contest these findings, arguing that more than 500 students have successfully earned certifications, citing different definitions of what constitutes "industry-recognized" credentials. The discrepancies in reported outcomes lend credence to a critical review of how effectiveness is assessed in these programs.

The experiences of students highlight a broader issue facing online CTE education. For some like Elly Krawinkel, who struggled with anxiety and chose a path in agriculture without earning credentials or work-based credits, this raises questions about whether for-profit models adequately serve students with diverse needs. Critics argue that students facing challenges may fare better in traditional settings with targeted support rather than being placed in virtual programs that lack sufficient oversight and resources.

On the other hand, Mileka's success and her ambitious plans for a future coffee shop underscore the potential for online CTE programs to empower students when executed effectively. As her mother aptly puts it: "If you've had a bad experience with online school, it doesn't mean it's because it's online; it could just be the school." This sentiment resonates as families navigate their options in a rapidly changing education landscape.

As states evaluate and potentially reform their oversight of online CTE programs, experts suggest implementing strategies that tie funding to student outcomes—like earning professional credentials. In Texas, new incentives for districts that successfully graduate students with industry-recognized certificates exemplify a proactive approach to improving the landscape of online vocational education.

While online career training is clearly on the rise, its variable effectiveness necessitates careful scrutiny from all stakeholders involved—educators, policymakers, and families alike. As echoed in the experiences of Cori, Mileka, and Elly, the success of such initiatives is often determined not just by the programs themselves, but by the support systems and oversight that nurture student engagement and achievement.

The future of online career training should focus on building frameworks that prioritize practical experiences alongside academic learning, ensuring students receive the comprehensive education necessary to thrive in the workforce.

Source: Steven Yoder · hechingerreport.org

Comments

Please sign in to comment.
Novrasta Market Intelligence